Constitutionality of mandating flu shots Phone sex conversations pattern in englsh hinfi texts

Posted by / 09-Jun-2018 21:58

That corresponded with a 12 percent drop in the influenza-associated hospitalization rate among children aged 4 or younger compared to 2007-08.

These improvements are doubly important since preschoolers are considered the most likely group to both spread the flu as well as come down with severe complications from it.

The main rationale behind mandatory flu shots is that healthcare workers and others in ‘people jobs' should get the vaccine in order to keep from spreading it to higher-risk people.

This seems smart and even valiant, but unfortunately there is decent evidence that flu shots are largely ineffective and sometimes dangerous.

States such as Connecticut have enacted similar laws for their preschool population, with unequivocal success.

A 2014 report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found that flu vaccination rates for children under the age of 6 jumped from 67.8 percent during the 2009–10 influenza season (the year before the mandate went into effect) to 84.1 percent during the 2012–13 season.

It may not seem like a big deal, but it can end being as stigmatizing as the wearing of the scarlet letter. They state that requiring medical treatment is a “human rights violation, is a violation of the Patient Bill of Rights, and is a huge EEOC (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission) violation.” () If you don't have a job around immunocompromised folks, mandatory flu shots have no logical grounds to exist other than the wish for workplace productivity.

In the end, Supreme Court Judge Manuel Mendez issued his ruling not because mandatory flu vaccination isn’t worthwhile, but because the city overstepped its bounds.

The current array of enforced childhood vaccinations for diseases such as rubella and measles was previously determined by a vote from New York’s state legislature, and only they retain the “statutory authority to mandate vaccinations not already expressed with the Public Health Law,” Mendez ruled.“Parents across the city who, in consultation with their doctors, made the decision that the risks outweighed the benefits for their particular child, had that right taken away from them by 11 unelected individuals sitting in the Board of Health right across the street,” said Aaron Siri, an attorney representing the mothers, at a news conference following the decision.

In fact, one meta study from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) shows that vaccine doesn't reduce the incidence of flu in healthcare facilities as much as previously thought.

“We simply don't have good evidence that vaccination of healthcare personnel prevents influenza transmission to patients,” said Nick Kelley, Ph D, research associate for the University of Minnesota's Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy.

constitutionality of mandating flu shots-54constitutionality of mandating flu shots-70constitutionality of mandating flu shots-21

I was a bit miffed however, by a recent conversation with a woman who works as a nutritionist at a large university in Los Angeles.